Which of the following is a reason the CJSTC may act against an officer's certification?

• A. Pleading nolo contendere or guilty to a felony, failing to maintain good moral character, committing felony offenses, and other specified violations
• B. Being late to work
• C. Completing annual training
• D. Receiving a commendation

Answer: (A)

The main idea is that certification can be taken away when an officer’s conduct seriously undermines their fitness to serve, especially in areas that affect trust and integrity. Pleading nolo contendere or guilty to a felony, failing to maintain good moral character, and committing felony offenses are exactly the kinds of serious misconduct that directly call into question an officer’s suitability to hold certification. These actions reflect on character, honesty, and ongoing reliability, which are core requirements for licensed peace officers, so the CJSTC has the authority to discipline, suspend, or revoke certification in such cases. In contrast, being late to work is a management or attendance issue, completing annual training is a positive compliance activity, and receiving a commendation is an endorsement of good performance. Those do not indicate the same risk to certification, so they are not grounds for action by the CJSTC.